<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Swampette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swampette.com</link>
	<description>a gator in...gainesville</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:14:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>REVIEW: Castle</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=274</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=274#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interest in this book came from two sources: this New York Times review (Pieces for the Left Hand is on my reading list as well), and the fact that J. Robert Lennon was one of BigRed&#8217;s college writing instructors. He read Castle a couple months ago; I hope he&#8217;ll comment.
We get to know Eric [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My interest in this book came from two sources: this New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/books/review/Bradfield-t.html" target="_blank">review</a> (<em>Pieces for the Left Hand</em> is on my reading list as well), and the fact that J. Robert Lennon was one of BigRed&#8217;s college writing instructors. He read <em>Castle</em> a couple months ago; I hope he&#8217;ll comment.<span id="more-274"></span></p>
<p>We get to know Eric Loesch as if we&#8217;re meeting him, learning only superficial tidbits. At first his outbursts are amusing, like a new friend acting out. As the novel progresses, it exudes a growing sense of creepiness as we gradually learn his local history, and eventually the personal horrors of his past. We fear that if we laugh too hard at his antics or look at him too directly, we might be the next target.</p>
<p>As an exercise in character development, <em>Castle</em> is excellent. It felt complete and real, as accurate as a first-person reality can be. The plot is somewhat disjointed, however. I suspect Mr. Lennon knew in advance the various patchwork pieces he wanted to include, but didn&#8217;t find the best way to sew them up. Overall, this doesn&#8217;t detract too much from the book as it is clear that each segment, however rough the transition, is necessary to see the complete picture. I would recommend reading this book as quickly as possible, to improve its fluidity. I would also recommend reading it with the lights on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=274</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading This Week</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=263</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=263#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renegade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I finished up Black Flies, and then moved on to Renegade by Richard Wolffe. I love watching Richard Wolffe on MSNBC; his commentary is usually very insightful. That&#8217;s why I was particularly disappointed by Renegade. Mr. Wolffe&#8217;s writing seemed unnatural, with sentence fragments and repetition of the word &#8220;renegade&#8221; that felt forced. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-264" style="margin: 5px;" title="Renegade" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Renegade.jpg" alt="Renegade" width="140" height="213" />This week I finished up Black Flies, and then moved on to Renegade by Richard Wolffe. I love watching Richard Wolffe on MSNBC; his commentary is usually very insightful. That&#8217;s why I was particularly disappointed by Renegade. Mr. Wolffe&#8217;s writing seemed unnatural, with sentence fragments and repetition of the word &#8220;renegade&#8221; that felt forced. The campaign was presented disjointedly, without chronological or any other logical order of events. Perhaps Mr. Wolffe hasn&#8217;t figure out how to escape his journalist roots; I felt as though I&#8217;d read a greatest hits of newspaper election coverage.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-265 alignright" style="margin: 5px;" title="Black Flies" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Black-Flies.jpg" alt="Black Flies" width="140" height="210" /></p>
<p>Black Flies was excellent &#8211; highly recommended. A former paramedic in Harlem, Burke isn&#8217;t the strongest writer in an academic sense. But he writes with an incredibly strong voice, stronger than many novelists who may be considered to be technically &#8220;better&#8221; writers. Though categorized as a novel, Burke writes so graphically, drawing (I assume) from his own experiences, that I had to keep reminding myself it was fiction. An outstanding book, but not for the faint of heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=263</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it wrong that I like this?</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=256</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=256#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Daughtry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Chris Daughtry &#8211; Poker Face Cover

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="405" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9r3tg_untitled_shortfilms&amp;related=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="405" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9r3tg_untitled_shortfilms&amp;related=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<strong><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9r3tg_untitled_shortfilms">Chris Daughtry &#8211; Poker Face Cover</a></strong><br />
<em><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/us/channel/shortfilms"></a></em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=256</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black and White in a Gray World</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=244</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=244#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel badly for Mark Sanford. His e-mails seem to show genuine emotion, love, and internal conflict over a difficult situation in which many adults find themselves. Though I would never condone adultery, I believe it is a mistake to paint one-time offenders who enter into a second loving relationship with the same brush we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel badly for Mark Sanford. His <a href="http://www.thestate.com/sanford/story/839350.html" target="_blank">e-mails</a> seem to show genuine emotion, love, and internal conflict over a difficult situation in which many adults find themselves. Though I would never condone adultery, I believe it is a mistake to paint one-time offenders who enter into a second loving relationship with the same brush we use to paint womanizing repeat cheaters. I tend to think that although cheating is always a result of poor choices, much of the world exists in a vast gray area where outside objective judgments are difficult &#8211; if not impossible.<span id="more-244"></span></p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the particularly difficult corner the Republican Party has painted itself into. The number of people who benefit from its economic policies isn&#8217;t large enough to win elections. In its quest to build a coalition, it turned to &#8220;values&#8221; voters: people who see the world only in black and white. Voters like Tony Perkins, president of the warm-and-fuzzy-sounding Family Research Council, who declared in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/25/us/25repubs.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th" target="_blank">New York Times</a> today that Republicans are finally having a come-to-Jesus moment. “Are they going to be a party that attracts values voters, and are they going to be the party that lives by those values?” he asked.</p>
<p>Being the values party means living in black and white, and that isn&#8217;t sustainable. What we&#8217;re seeing now are the inevitable falls from grace of politicians &#8211; real people &#8211; who held themselves above the gray world of reality. The facade of moral perfection has a very short shelf life. It has begun to spoil, but Republicans are looking for the cause of the stench in all the wrong places.</p>
<p>Relying on voters who don&#8217;t live in a gray world has already cost the party voters who do. If they continue this strategy, the combined imperfection and intolerance of their candidates will cost them their existence. It may take a while, but I think we&#8217;re seeing the swan song of the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=244</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Recommendation: Water Dogs</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=238</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=238#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Dogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me preface this by saying that I&#8217;m only halfway through, but I strongly recommend Lewis Robinson&#8217;s Water Dogs, especially as a summer/beach read. I&#8217;ve seen it reviewed a couple different places, so you may have already heard off it. At any rate, Water Dogs is a quick read &#8211; not taxing but not fluff, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-239" style="margin-bottom: 5px; margin-right: 8px;" title="Water Dogs" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Water-Dogs.jpg" alt="Water Dogs" width="86" height="130" />Let me preface this by saying that I&#8217;m only halfway through, but I strongly recommend Lewis Robinson&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Water-Dogs-Novel-Lewis-Robinson/dp/1400062179/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1245776875&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">Water Dogs</a>, especially as a summer/beach read. I&#8217;ve seen it reviewed a couple different places, so you may have already heard off it. At any rate, Water Dogs is a quick read &#8211; not taxing but not fluff, either. Of particular interest is that it takes place during winter in Maine, so it has a psychological cooling effect you may enjoy if you&#8217;re getting record high temperatures as we are. Following State by State, I would say that Robinson accurately captures Maine &#8211; or, given my zero actual minutes spent in Maine, my concept thereof. Give it a try! (And if you do, let me know what you think!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=238</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality TV and Politics</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=193</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=193#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that nearly every possible premise for a reality television show has been produced already, I&#8217;m surprised that the genre hasn&#8217;t dipped into the world of politics yet. The initial reaction to such a show would probably be one of disgust. There would be editorials written about how the program showed the decay of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that nearly every possible premise for a reality television show has been produced already, I&#8217;m surprised that the genre hasn&#8217;t dipped into the world of politics yet. The initial reaction to such a show would probably be one of disgust. There would be editorials written about how the program showed the decay of the political process, proving that the presidential vote had become nothing better than a popularity contest.</p>
<p>But once it started airing, I bet &#8220;Presidential Idol&#8221; be a smash hit. The winner would likely get tons of free publicity by way of the media, and with successful management, they&#8217;d have a real shot at the presidency.<br />
<span id="more-193"></span><br />
The first episodes would be like American Idol or So You Think You Can Dance: a panel of judges would visit different cities around the country, listening to 2 or 3 minute stump speeches by presidential hopefuls.<sup><a href="#note1">1</a></sup> Auditioners would be required to have no previous political experience. Rounds would progress with different challenges, until the field had been narrowed down to a dozen or so, and then America would start eliminating candidates by phone vote. The leading candidates would likely be populist, moderate, and have compelling backstories.</p>
<p>A smart show producer would take a cue from real campaigns at this level of the show. Viewers could be able to go online, get a list of registered voters, and make phone calls on behalf of their favorite candidate. Since they&#8217;re calling about the TV show and not the actual presidential vote, it (probably) wouldn&#8217;t be breaking election law regarding a corporation&#8217;s support of a candidate. The process could have an incentive along the lines of &#8220;whoever calls the most gets to be on the show&#8221;, or something to that effect.</p>
<p>To further boost the show&#8217;s grassroots efforts, they could attempt to build an entire party, with candidates running in a primary at the congressional level, powered mostly through the show&#8217;s website. The television show would be focused on the presidential race, but it could spend 10 minutes or so each episode highlighting one or two of these smaller races around the country. People would become dedicated to the program with this extra content, and perhaps the new party would incite a Ron Paul-style internet movement &#8211; this time, though, the movement would be made up of the reality TV audience, not nerds.</p>
<p>Once the winner is picked, the network would cut all ties with the candidate, and they&#8217;d start out on their own. The media attention would likely be enough to get a huge number of donations and volunteers, and with the correct management, the candidate could make the jump to independence without a hitch. A smart winner would continue the ideas of the show, by having a regular web video program, and rewarding top volunteers with mentions.</p>
<p>The biggest key to success, I&#8217;d bet, is how the media latched on to the story. If it were an election like 2000 or 2004, where a popular opinion was that the two major candidates were both bad or too similar, the Presidential Idol might be heralded by the press as a savior for the system. Entry to the debates would be assured (&#8221;Tonight&#8217;s top story: the Commission on Presidential Debates continues to deny ____ entry to the first debate of the year. What are they afraid of?&#8221;). But if it were an election like 2008, where Barack Obama&#8217;s historic nomination seemed to rule things, they might regard the winner as a product of bad American entertainment and a joke.</p>
<p>The fact that Presidential Idol would be successful may sound a little scary, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;d be all bad. With no previous political experience, the candidate would have no ties to lobbyists, no favors to pay to other politicians, and no hedged stances on issues like gay marriage and health care. They didn&#8217;t have to win a partisan primary, so they didn&#8217;t have to sell out moderate stances to woo over an activist wing. The only other way to achieve this sort of independence, really, is to run a completely self-funded campaign. (And that&#8217;d require some serious eccentricity.)</p>
<p>Now, if the candidate actually won, I have no idea what would happen. I do believe that the show would produce someone very capable &#8211; even though they came from a TV show, viewers would probably take their decision very seriously. (Look at how much serious discussion was had about Adam vs. Kris.) My bet would be on a 40-something successful small business owner, who worked his way up from nothing, probably some military experience, and a young family. The Idol&#8217;s cabinet would likely be a mixture of Republicans, Democrats, and experts from the private sector.</p>
<p>Would the country survive? Well, the winner couldn&#8217;t do worse than Bush. </p>
<p><sub><a name="note1" />Note 1: The age requirement for the presidency, 35+, might hurt the show. There&#8217;s a reason American Idol has an age limit of 29 &#8211; they&#8217;re harder to market when they get older. Maybe &#8220;Congressional Idol&#8221;, with a minimum age of just 25, would be more successful.</sub></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=193</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quick Break From Studying&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=188</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Fill-Ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FridayFill-Ins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My biscuits this morning failed. I&#8217;ll try again within the week. For now, here&#8217;s a little fun, then I&#8217;m off to study all day. Wish me luck tomorrow morning!
1.  All children alarm their parents, if only because you are forever expecting them to make all the same mistakes you did.
2.  Show me a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biscuits this morning failed. I&#8217;ll try again within the week. For now, here&#8217;s a little fun, then I&#8217;m off to study all day. Wish me luck tomorrow morning!<span id="more-188"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-139" style="margin: 5px;" title="FridayFill-Ins" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/FridayFill-Ins-150x108.png" alt="FridayFill-Ins" width="150" height="108" />1.  All children alarm their parents, if only because you are forever expecting <span style="color: #ff00ff;">them to make all the same mistakes you did.</span></p>
<p>2.  Show me a good loser and I will show you a <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>graceful winner</strong></span>.</p>
<p>3. <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>Watching <em>Real Housewives of New Jersey</em></strong></span> is like eating an entire box of chocolate liqueurs at one time.</p>
<p>4.  Too bad that all the people who know how to run the country are busy <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>microlending in Southeast Asia</strong></span>.</p>
<p>5.  I have yet to hear a man ask for advice on how to combine <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>peanut butter</strong></span> and <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>Peeps</strong></span>.</p>
<p>6.  It is impossible to think of any good meal, no matter how plain or elegant, without <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>cheese</strong></span> or <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>bacon</strong></span> in it. [That's not really true. But it <em>is</em> impossible to think of any meal that can't be improved with those two things.]</p>
<p>7.  And as for the weekend, tonight I&#8217;m looking forward to <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>spinning (hey, it&#8217;ll give me a break from studying!)</strong></span>, tomorrow my plans include <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>the dreaded CNA exam</strong></span> and Sunday, I want to <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>relax</strong></span>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: State by State</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=132</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=132#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State by State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than once while reading State by State, I&#8217;d turn to Brian and say, &#8220;Let&#8217;s move to _______.&#8221; Brian&#8217;s response was almost always, &#8220;Ok. [pause] You know how cold it gets there, right?&#8221; While it is unlikely that I will have the opportunity to live in every state, that is the response I had hoped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than once while reading State by State, I&#8217;d turn to Brian and say, &#8220;Let&#8217;s move to _______.&#8221; Brian&#8217;s response was almost always, &#8220;Ok. [pause] You know how cold it gets there, right?&#8221; While it is unlikely that I will have the opportunity to live in every state, that is the response I had hoped this book would evoke in me. For the most part, it did not let me down.<span id="more-132"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-117" title="state-by-state" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/state-by-state-150x150.jpg" alt="state-by-state" width="150" height="150" />Curious, I went back to investigate: it was this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/books/review/Moehringer-t.html?pagewanted=1" target="_blank">review</a> that initially inspired me to read <em>State by State. </em>Have you ever re-read a review after reading the book? The inaccuracies and quotes out of context can be quite startling. It is also not the first time that I&#8217;ve been struck with the thought that it is the reviewer&#8217;s writing that often causes me to pick up a particular book rather than the author&#8217;s. I did not, as the reviewer presumed, skim through the book, picking and choosing states&#8217; essays because of my history with them. I actually read cover to cover, visiting each state alphabetically. I strongly recommend this approach, because having lived in a state does not guarantee you&#8217;ll enjoy that state&#8217;s essay. Indeed there were three states (well, two plus D.C.) that I had to abandon because they were simply too leaden.</p>
<p>As I read, I tried to find a theme that separated a mediocre piece from an outstanding one. Should the author be a native of his or her state? Not necessarily. Lydia Millet, Mohammed Naseehu Ali and Cristina Henriquez had beautiful pieces about Arizona, Michigan, and Texas, respectively, despite being from elsewhere. The Delaware section was written by <em>a Canadian</em> &#8211; the nerve! &#8211; but it was still quite insightful. Must the writer love the state? Not at all. Rick Moody&#8217;s always outstanding writing was thoroughly enjoyable all while convincing me that Connecticut&#8217;s Merritt Parkway might actually be the road to hell, with layovers in Alcoholism, Divorce, and Depression. It helped &#8211; tremendously &#8211; for the topic to be personal rather than didactic (only Idaho&#8217;s Anthony Doerr managed to do both), but a couple of the clunkers were quite personal. It turns out that the only common thread I could identify was ephemeral: the essayist had to &#8220;capture&#8221; his or her state. He or she had to transport you, make you feel you could see, hear, smell the things being described. That is probably true of most good writing, though I was surprised by the names that failed to accomplish this.</p>
<p>Brian asked me what my favorite section was. Paul Greenberg&#8217;s Alaska stands out, but I would be lying if I didn&#8217;t admit I favored Florida. I was deeply offended to discover that the Florida chapter&#8217;s author was born and raised not in Florida, but in Danville, IL, until age 11 (at which point he did, in fact, move to the Keys). From there he proceeded to attend the University of Iowa (?) and receive an MFA (MFA!) in writing from UC-Irvine. This gentleman was going to tell the story of my Florida? I think not. But all was forgotten when he revealed that he won a writing contest sponsored by Jimmy Buffett, and as such won a tour of the local Keys with Buffett himself. His essay made me laugh, tear up, and nod knowingly, thoroughly recognizing my crazy state and all that I love about it. That, in the end, is what what I was really looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=132</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Update Roundup</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=152</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=152#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recipes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crawfest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have several pictures that I&#8217;ve been meaning to post. I finally installed an ad block, which made Picnik run faster, so I don&#8217;t have to use Photoshop.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have several pictures that I&#8217;ve been meaning to post. I finally installed an ad block, which made <a href="http://www.picnik.com/" target="_blank">Picnik</a> run faster, so I don&#8217;t have to use Photoshop.<span id="more-152"></span></p>

<a href='http://swampette.com/?attachment_id=157' title='CrawFest'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/IMG_5869-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Craw Fest 2009" title="CrawFest" /></a>
<a href='http://swampette.com/?attachment_id=155' title='Brian at Craw Fest'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Brian-at-Crawfest-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Brian&#039;s First Crawfish!" title="Brian at Craw Fest" /></a>
<a href='http://swampette.com/?attachment_id=156' title='Heirloom Tomato Pasta'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Pasta1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="We had our vegetarian friend Dave over for dinner, and made this Heirloom Tomato Pasta! It&#039;s one of my new favorites!" title="Heirloom Tomato Pasta" /></a>
<a href='http://swampette.com/?attachment_id=154' title='Grapefruit Loaf'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/grapefruit-loaf-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="This grapefruit loaf is a twist on a traditional lemon poppy loaf. I loved it; Brian, not so much." title="Grapefruit Loaf" /></a>
<a href='http://swampette.com/?attachment_id=153' title='Pasta Salad'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/IMG_5887-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="We had this last night. It was light but flavorful - perfect for the 95 degree weather!" title="Pasta Salad" /></a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=152</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying Some New Things</title>
		<link>http://swampette.com/?p=138</link>
		<comments>http://swampette.com/?p=138#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swampette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Fill-Ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FridayFill-Ins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swampette.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found myself in a slightly weakened state this morning, so I&#8217;ve been doing a little more random internet cruising than usual. Apparently, the blog world has group activities: topics, or questions, or posts where everyone answers the same questions or does some little stunt on the same day. I kind of like this concept [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found myself in a slightly weakened state this morning, so I&#8217;ve been doing a little more random internet cruising than usual. Apparently, the blog world has group activities: topics, or questions, or posts where everyone answers the same questions or does some little stunt on the same day. I kind of like this concept as a way of getting myself to write and post more. Here goes:<span id="more-138"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://fridayfillins.blogspot.com/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-139" style="margin: 5px;" title="FridayFill-Ins" src="http://swampette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/FridayFill-Ins-150x108.png" alt="FridayFill-Ins" width="150" height="108" /></a>1.  I grew up thinking <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>that I would be a vet, and build a house on my parents&#8217; property</strong></span>.</p>
<p>2. <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>Twitter</strong></span> was the last website I was at before coming here.</p>
<p>3.  Why don&#8217;t you <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>learn something new today</strong></span>?</p>
<p>4. <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>Exercising</strong></span> helps me relax.</p>
<p>5.  Thanks for the <strong><span style="color: #ff00ff;">memories</span></strong><span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong></strong></span>.</p>
<p>6. <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>Screaming children are</strong></span> very off-putting.</p>
<p>7.  And as for the weekend, tonight I&#8217;m looking forward to <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>getting rid of my headache</strong></span>, tomorrow my plans include <strong><span style="color: #ff00ff;">giving Lilly a bath and going through Martha Stewart&#8217;s monthly cleaning checklist</span></strong> and Sunday, I want to <span style="color: #ff00ff;"><strong>finish my book &#8211; or start a new one</strong><span style="color: #000000;">!</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swampette.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=138</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
